0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ä¾çº´¿ø ÀÔ¿øȯÀÚ Æò°¡µµ±¸ÀÇ Å¸´çµµ¿Í ½Å·Úµµ

A Study of Validity and Reliability of a Patient Assessment Instrument for Long-Term Care Hospitals

³ëÀΰ£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2008³â 10±Ç 1È£ p.7 ~ 19
KMID : 0895920080100010007
ÀÌÁöÀ± ( Lee Ji-Yun ) - °Ç°­º¸Çè½É»çÆò°¡¿ø ½É»çÆò°¡¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ

Àå»ç¶û ( Jang Sa-Rang ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ º¸°Ç´ëÇпø
À±ÁÖ¿µ ( Yun Ju-Young ) - °Ç°­º¸Çè½É»çÆò°¡¿ø ½É»çÆò°¡¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of a patient assessment instrument for patients in long-term care hospitals.

Method: The participants in this study were 90 patients admitted to 3 long-term care hospitals. The data were collected in May and June 2007. Criterion related validity of the K-ADL (Korean Activities of Daily Living) was tested using Spearman correlation with the K-MBI (Korean Modified Barthel Index). Inter-rater reliability between two nurses was tested using weighted kappa and agreement percentage.

Results: Criterion- related validity of the K-ADL with the K-MBI was good with average Spearman correlation coefficient=0.96. Correlation coefficients of items were between 0.63 and 0.96. Inter-rater reliability was satisfactory with the average weighted kappa equal to 0.76. Items with weighted kappa of more than 0.4 numbered 122 (86.5%) and of more than 0.75, 74 (52.5%).

Conclusion: The patient assessment instrument for patients in long-term care hospitals is reliable and K-ADL is valid for classifying these patients based on resource utilization, and for quality monitoring indicators.
KeyWords
Àå±â¿ä¾ç, Æò°¡, µµ±¸, Ÿ´çµµ, ½Å·Úµµ
Long-Term Care, Assessment, Instrument, Validity, Reliability
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
  
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)